POEA Issues Warning To Agencies Not Complying with Placement Fee Policies Read more: http://www.ofwguide.com/article_item-1796/POEA-Issues-Warning-To-Agencies-Not-Complying-with-Placement-Fee-Policies.html#ixzz23oG813rE

Hans Cacdac, the chief of the Philippine Overseas Employment Administration (POEA), issued a warning to licensed agencies that are charging excessive placement fees to their overseas applicants.

In an article that appeared in the POEAwebsite, Cacdac remindedrecruitment agenciesthat violation of policies surrounding collection of placement fees would cost them to lose their license.

The POEA chief also advises Filipino jobseekers that they would only be required to pay placement fees after signing an employment contract. It is also a must that applicants are issued an official receipt that states the total amountpaid.

Another advice of the POEA chief to jobseekers is to avoid licensed agencies that continue to disobey the rules in placement fee collection which is clearly defined in various promulgations.

According to DOLE Department Order No. 34, Series of 1996, POEA Governing Board Resolution No. 2, series of 1998, and POEAMemorandumCircular No. 14, Series of 1999 authorize arecruitmentagency to collect from its hired workers “an amount equivalent to one month salary, exclusive of documentation and processing costs”.

Section 2 b, Rule 1, Part 6 of the 2002 POEA Rules and Regulations prohibits “charging or accepting directly or indirectly any amount greater than that specified in thescheduleof allowable fees prescribed by the Secretary, or making a worker pay any amount greater than that actually received by him asa loanor advance.”

Cacdac also mentioned that it is totally prohibited to charge placement fees to Filipino household service workers, seafarers, and workers for deployment to countries that do not allow placement fee collection.

Charging placement fees from Filipino household service workers is prohibited under POEA Governing Board Resolution No. 6, Series of 2006.Section 2 c, Rule 1, Part 6 of the POEA Rules defines as arecruitmentviolation any act of“charging or collecting placement fee for deployment to countries where the prevailing system, either by law, policy or practice, do not allow the charging or collection of placement andrecruitmentfees”.

The POEA Rules also exempt seafarers from paying  placement fees. Countries likeUnited Kingdom,Ireland,Norway, and theNetherlandsdo not allow the collection of placement fee byrecruitment agenciesfrom foreign workers because theemployer is paying the cost of placement andrecruitmentservices.

The prohibition is also applicable to agencies that are deploying workers to theCanadaprovinces ofManitoba,Saskatchewan,Alberta, andBritish Columbia. Cacdac said that hiring of foreign workers in occupations that usually require a high school diploma or a maximum of 2 years of job-specific training (level Cand D) under the Pilot Project of the Government of Canada is also covered by the prohibition on collection of placement fee. Under the prevailing policy of theCanadagovernment, employers shall cover allrecruitmentcosts related to the hiring of foreign workers.

The ‘no placement fee’ policy also covers agencies deploying workers to theU.S.A.,includingGuam, Cacdac said.POEAMemorandumCircular No.10, Series of 2009 orders that licensedrecruitmentagencies recruiting Filipino workers under the H2B program for theUnited States, includingGuam,are strictly prohibited from charging any placement andrecruitmentfees from Filipino workers bound for these destinations.

TheUnited States’ Department ofHomeland Securityon 18 January 2009, hasimplemented regulatory changes to the H2B visa classification used for foreign workersseeking employmentin theUnited StatesandGuam. Under the new rules, the cost ofrecruitmentof these workers must be borne by employers and the charging or collection of placement fee by an employer, agent, facilitator,recruiteror similar employment service provider from workers under the H2B visa category or temporary skilled labor is illegal.Cacdac said violation of the "no placement fee" policy is a serious administrative offense with a penalty of cancellation of license under Section 1-A (5) of Rule IV, Part VI of the POEA Rules and Regulations Governing theRecruitmentand Employment of Land based Workers.

Cacdac further urged applicants to report to POEA anyrecruitmentagency that charges excessive placement fees or collect fees which are not sanctioned by other countries.

From: www.POEA.gov.ph

Read more:http://www.ofwguide.com/article_item-1796/POEA-Issues-Warning-To-Agencies-Not-Complying-with-Placement-Fee-Policies.html#ixzz23oG2wewx